Things were cleanly black and white, with Indy struggling for a just cause, and his opponents heavily dabbling in evil. There is a shade more cynicism within Crystal Skull, particularly through the triple-crossing Mac, but the reality is that the film remains clearcut, despite being released into a cinematic landscape where blockbusters had decided upon the moral ambiguity of their protagonists as the central thematic tension. But what it does have is an arch sense of humour which carries it through; straight into the arms of Indy 5 ….
But the lack of a strong companion, overreliance on the wrong kind of dark tone, and lessened focus on Indiana Jones as an intellectual makes it a somewhat less fulfilling entry in the franchise. Last Crusade is the most ambitious film of the franchise, as Spielberg and Lucas send their hero on a globe-trotting adventure to recover yet another all-important religious artifact.
The crux of the story lies in Indy rekindling and accepting his relationship with his father, who in another case of spot on casting is played by James Bond himself, Sean Connery. The dynamic between Ford and Connery is wonderfully executed. It relishes the talk-y intellectual moments of Raiders and eschews the more grotesque aspects of Temple in favor of comedy and snappy dialogue. Honestly The Last Crusade makes a strong case for the best of the Indiana Jones bunch, but ultimately the consistent sharpness and God-tier level filmmaking of Raiders of the Lost Ark nudges it just ahead to the top spot.
He makes it out in one piece, but often by the skin of his nose. But we learn almost all we need to know about Indy in that first sequence, and then the character is even further fleshed out in the next sequence, in which this dashing hero is revealed to be a highly intelligent professor at Marshall College.
If Indiana Jones 5 wants to redeem the franchise, it needs to have the established characters reinvent themselves in some way.
This doesn't mean viewers want Indiana Jones to become a villain even though some fans already seem to think Jones actually is the villain or the opposite of everything they've known about him.
But, the new film will need to give viewers that sense of discovery they got while watching the first films. Another great thing about the original films is their use of practical stunts and action sequences. The filmmaker, Speilberg, did not hold back on blood or the imagery of death.
There were no CGI groundhogs, and cinematography felt classic and tangible. And viewers really believed that Harrison Ford's Indiana Jones character was seconds away from real danger. Many of the best filmmakers working today know that relying too much on CGI can take away from the experience of the movie. Practical effects are much more believable and can be enhanced with CGI to make them look more aesthetically pleasing.
In order for the fifth film to not replace Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull as the worst film in the franchise, it needs to do a few things. While it drifts into silly territory towards the end, the ancient aliens plot is intriguing and fits well with the s setting.
The Temple of Doom stands out from the rest of the series with its significantly darker tone , and its violence and shock factor actually led to the creation of the PG rating but received a PG rating for its release.
0コメント